Start My Claim

Real compensation ranges for age discrimination in UK employment tribunals. Vento bands, worked examples, the justification defence, and why late-career claims often run to six figures.

How much compensation can I get for age discrimination in the UK?

Age discrimination awards are uncapped and tend to cluster between £15,000 and £60,000 for successful claims, though six-figure awards are common where the claimant was late career and cannot realistically find comparable work. The financial loss element dominates because older claimants take significantly longer to return to equivalent pay — tribunals accept that a 58-year-old made redundant on discriminatory grounds faces a different market than a 28-year-old.

Is age the only protected characteristic that can be "justified"?

Age is unique: both direct and indirect age discrimination can be defended if the employer proves the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. For every other protected characteristic, only indirect discrimination has that defence. This makes age claims more technical — the tribunal weighs the employer's aim (for example, workforce planning, intergenerational fairness, health and safety) against the discriminatory impact.

Can I claim if I was made redundant because of my age?

Yes, but you need to show age was a reason for your selection. Common patterns: scoring criteria that penalise long service, selection pools drawn to exclude older workers, voluntary redundancy packages targeted at a specific age bracket, or managers using phrases like "fresh blood", "new generation", or "nearing retirement". These phrases are evidence goldmines because the burden of proof shifts once age is raised as a factor.

Is there still a default retirement age in the UK?

No. The default retirement age of 65 was abolished in 2011. An employer can only enforce a retirement age if they can justify it as a proportionate means of a legitimate aim (for example some policing or aviation roles). Telling a 64-year-old they are "expected to retire" or starting retirement conversations against their wishes is direct age discrimination and opens the employer to a claim.

Can younger workers claim age discrimination?

Yes. The Equality Act protects every age. Younger workers win claims for being passed over as "not experienced enough when others that age are", being excluded from training offered to older colleagues, or receiving reduced benefits based on age bands unconnected to any legitimate aim. Age discrimination is not a "gets older" protection — it is neutral across the range.

Will my future loss be projected to retirement?

Potentially, yes. In older-worker cases, tribunals routinely accept that return to comparable earnings is unlikely and project loss for several years — sometimes through to state pension age. The Ogden tables (used in personal injury cases) are often applied. A £20,000 annual shortfall projected across five years in a late-career case can produce a six-figure future loss head before injury to feelings is even considered.

What evidence should I gather for an age discrimination claim?

Preserve every email, Teams message, meeting note, and performance review. Age comments are often casual — "past it", "behind the times with tech", "not where the team is going", "nearing the finish line". Keep copies of job adverts used for replacement hires, selection matrices from any redundancy process, and training invites you were excluded from. Comparative data on who was kept and who was let go is powerful at hearing.

No statutory cap on compensation

Protects younger and older workers equally

Default retirement age abolished in 2011

If a tribunal finds you were treated less favourably because of your age, it awards compensation under the same heads as any other discrimination claim: injury to feelings under the Vento bands, past loss, future loss, and — where applicable — personal injury damages and an ACAS uplift. What makes age cases different is the economics of late-career re-entry. An older claimant who loses a role at the top of their pay grade may never return to comparable earnings, and that shortfall is compensable.

The other distinguishing feature is the justification defence. Unlike race or sex, age is the one protected characteristic where even direct discrimination can be defended if the employer proves the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Tribunals apply this strictly — vague claims about "workforce planning" or "bringing in new ideas" rarely satisfy the test.

Isolated ageist comment quickly addressed by the employer, short-term exclusion from a training opportunity, one-off denial of benefit later corrected.

Redundancy selection criteria that favoured younger staff, repeated exclusion from development opportunities, pressure to retire, unfair performance management targeting older employees.

Sustained pressure to retire, sham redundancy used to remove an older worker, senior management involvement, dismissal that effectively ended a career.

Deliberate strategy to clear older workers from a workforce, senior-level targeting, multiple claimants from the same employer, psychiatric injury caused.

To defend a direct or indirect age discrimination claim the employer must prove the treatment was a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim". Tribunals break this into two questions: was the aim legitimate (a real social policy or business objective, not cost alone), and was the means proportionate (the least discriminatory measure that would achieve the aim).

Legitimate aims that have succeeded include intergenerational fairness, workforce planning, health and safety in physically demanding roles, and preserving training investment. Aims that usually fail include cost alone, "bringing in new energy", generic succession planning, and customer preference for younger staff. Even where the aim is legitimate, the employer must still show proportionality — a blanket rule rarely beats a tailored one.

Injury to feelings (Vento)

The humiliation, anxiety, and loss of dignity from being treated less favourably because of your age. Sits in the lower, middle or upper band according to severity and duration.

Net wages, bonuses, pension contributions, benefits and commission lost from dismissal to the tribunal hearing. Often larger in age cases because older claimants take longer to find comparable work.

The differential between pre- and post-dismissal earnings projected over a reasonable period. In late-career cases tribunals accept projections of several years, sometimes to state pension age, particularly where specialism makes replacement hard.

Separately quantified. For defined contribution schemes it is lost employer contributions plus assumed investment growth. For defined benefit schemes it can be very significant — expert actuarial evidence is routinely used.

Where the employer's conduct was high-handed or malicious — for example a manufactured capability process used to dismiss an older worker — tribunals can add aggravated damages on top of the Vento band.

Up to 25% uplift on compensatory elements where the employer unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code on grievances and disciplinary procedures.

Age discrimination — full guide

Unfair redundancy selection

How much for disability discrimination

How much for race discrimination

Vento bands explained

Building a schedule of loss